Xref: utzoo comp.fonts:2418 comp.text.tex:7108 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!ccu.umanitoba.ca!herald.usask.ca!alberta!ubc-cs!uw-beaver!milton!dali.cs.montana.edu!rpi!crdgw1!uunet!mcsun!ukc!slxsys!ibmpcug!mantis!mathew From: mathew@mantis.co.uk (mathew) Newsgroups: comp.fonts,comp.text.tex Subject: Re: Malvern (meta-)font and MFjob program now available Keywords: Malvern, MFjob, METAFONT, TeX, font, archive Message-ID: <1yX8115w164w@mantis.co.uk> Date: 30 Apr 91 13:28:59 GMT References: <4435@undis.cs.chalmers.se> Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK. Lines: 34 jeffrey@cs.chalmers.se (Alan Jeffrey) writes: > Because underlined bold Zapf Chancery doesn't have a history and > tradition of use as a book font, whereas sans serif fonts do. You may not > be a particular fan of the Bauhaus/asymmetric/geometric school of book > design, but it would be a brave individual who would deny the tremendous > impact it had on the look and feel of 20th century typesetting. Actually, I'm a great fan of geometric sans serif fonts IN THEIR PLACE. > Sans serif fonts are eminently suitable for setting book matter that > won't be read for hours at a time, such as magazines, some technical > reference books, advertising matter and children's books. I would phrase it as "You can get away with setting body text in a sans serif font if the reader's not going to have to look at it for long." > It's also > suitable for display work and headings. It's *excellent* for display work and headings. I quite agree with the rest of what you say about TeX; it does lack good alternatives to Computer Modern. I'm pleased to see new METAFONT fonts arriving; I was just reacting (or over-reacting) to the suggestion that an italic (or slanted) sans-serif font was a good font to set the main body of a piece of text in. Bung a few smileys in the article and read it again, if you like. mathew -- mathew - mathew@mantis.co.uk or mcsun!ukc!ibmpcug!mantis!mathew