Xref: utzoo comp.graphics:17585 news.groups:31456
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!dali.cs.montana.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!crdgw1!uunet!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!whb
From: whb@castle.ed.ac.uk (H Bruce)
Newsgroups: comp.graphics,news.groups
Subject: Re: Proposal for comp.graphics.research newsgroup
Keywords: discussion vs. asking for information
Message-ID: <9920@castle.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 29 Apr 91 12:51:48 GMT
References: <13207@goofy.Apple.COM>
Organization: Dept. Electrical Engineering, Edinburgh University, Scotland, UK.
Lines: 21

Good idea - but would it not be better to break comp.graphics into more than
one sub-group ?  eg

    comp.graphics.3d
    comp.graphics.formats  etc.

A poll would return an indication of what type of groups people wanted.
Although many groups would be suggested it shouldn't be difficult to come up
with a sensible compromise.

On a slightly different topic, main main interest is image processing.
I am pissed of with subject matter being scattered in :
   comp.graphics
   comp.ai.vision
   comp.dsp
   comp.compression

Anyone else feel the same way ?
If so any suggestions ?

Henry Bruce.