Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!csn!ccncsu!boulder!jamison
From: jamison@boulder.ColoState.EDU (Jamie Gulden)
Newsgroups: comp.graphics
Subject: Re: Proposal for comp.graphics.research newsgroup
Message-ID: <14581@ccncsu.ColoState.EDU>
Date: 29 Apr 91 15:39:25 GMT
References: <9104270206.AA17499@nomis.csd.uwo.ca>
Sender: news@ccncsu.ColoState.EDU
Reply-To: jamison@yuma.acns.colostate.edu (Jamie Gulden)
Organization: Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO  80523
Lines: 26

In article <9104270206.AA17499@nomis.csd.uwo.ca> clipper@csd.uwo.ca (Khun Yee Fung) writes:
>>>>>> On 26 Apr 91 22:20:29 GMT, turk@Apple.COM (Ken "Turk" Turkowski) said:
>Ken> Even though I work in the field of computer graphics, I have
>Ken> thought about unsubscribing to comp.graphics because none of the
>Ken> articles are interesting.

  Me too.  

>Ken> I propose the establish the newsgroup:
>Ken> 	comp.graphics.research

>May be comp.graphics.request should be established

  Would anyone use it, just like alt.pixutils (or whatever it is)
where half of the current comp.graphics belongs

>But I don't know
>whether there will be enough traffic for the research group though.

  Maybe having a group without the sludge will bring out those who
are tired of current situation and develope some serious discussions?

  I would say that a more specific group will get better results then
creating another group and asking others to move to it.

Jamie