Xref: utzoo comp.graphics:17590 news.groups:31457
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!rex!rouge!wuarchive!uunet!orca!undies!pmartz
From: pmartz@undies.dsd.es.com (Paul Martz)
Newsgroups: comp.graphics,news.groups
Subject: Re: Proposal for comp.graphics.research newsgroup
Keywords: discussion vs. asking for information
Message-ID: <1991Apr29.172208.18738@dsd.es.com>
Date: 29 Apr 91 17:22:08 GMT
References: <13207@goofy.Apple.COM> <9920@castle.ed.ac.uk>
Sender: usenet@dsd.es.com
Reply-To: pmartz@undies.dsd.es.com (Paul Martz)
Organization: Evans & Sutherland Computer Corp., Salt Lake City, UT
Lines: 19
Nntp-Posting-Host: 130.187.85.56

In article <9920@castle.ed.ac.uk>, whb@castle.ed.ac.uk (H Bruce) writes:
> Good idea - but would it not be better to break comp.graphics into more than
> one sub-group ?  eg
> 
>     comp.graphics.3d
>     comp.graphics.formats  etc.

It'll be much easier to get those of us interested in research topics
to move into a new group, than it would ever be to get all the
GIF-TIFF-BIFF people moved into a new group to discuss what they
have no trouble discussing right here. Excuse the run-on sentence.

I think comp.graphics.research is what is needed. 

What happens next, CFD? 
-- 

   -paul	pmartz@dsd.es.com
		Evans & Sutherland