Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!rex!rouge!gator.cacs.usl.edu!msr
From: msr@gator.cacs.usl.edu (Srinivas R. Manapragada)
Newsgroups: comp.graphics
Subject: Re: Proposal for comp.graphics.research newsgroup
Keywords: discussion vs. asking for information
Message-ID: <30098@rouge.usl.edu>
Date: 29 Apr 91 21:13:26 GMT
References: <13207@goofy.Apple.COM> <30038@rouge.usl.edu> <1991Apr29.110531.20870@cc.tut.fi>
Sender: anon@rouge.usl.edu
Organization: The Center for Advanced Computer Studies, USL
Lines: 32

In article <1991Apr29.110531.20870@cc.tut.fi> jk87377@cc.tut.fi (Juhana Kouhia) writes:
>
>Here it goes again... How about..
>
>comp.graphics.4d?	(For 4D animations, 4D fractals)
>comp.graphics.2.5d?	(For 2.5 hidden surface algorithms, 2.5D
>			fractals)
>
>:-)  :-)
>
>No vote for comp.graphics.3d from me.
>
>Juhana Kouhia

Come now, it was only a thought,

No vote requested and no vote taken for comp.graphics.3d :-)

However there does exist a mailing list for people interested in 4d, if
anybody is interested, they may send mail to fourd-request@edinburgh.ac.uk
with a request to be put on the list. I do not know of one for 2.5d though ;-)

In case I didn't make myself clear the last time

	comp.graphics.research 	- YES, YES, YES, ... ad infinitum

(Do votes get counted twice? if so I probably will post another yes :-)

I do agree that if we were to establish too narrow a scope for a group,
there probably would not be much traffic, but then we never know!

_Srini_