Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!well!levine From: levine@well.sf.ca.us (Ron Levine) Newsgroups: comp.graphics Subject: Re: Practical Intro to PHIGS (new book) Summary: An apology Message-ID: <24476@well.sf.ca.us> Date: 29 Apr 91 05:56:05 GMT References: <1991Apr19.175910.2922@Stardent.COM> <24373@well.sf.ca.us> Lines: 37 I offer my sincere apologies to Messrs. Howard, Hewitt, and Hubbold, and Ms. Wyrwas for the excessively emotive language of my two postings critiquing their book. It's all due to excessive haste, beginning with Jan Hardenbergh's hasty uncritical rave review, through my impulse to respond to his unjustified use of the superlative emotive "great book", and ending with my haste to post my response, trying to clear the issue from my agenda, without letting it simmer at all. This haste is characteristic of the USENET medium. To be sure, you would never find such language in any of my writings prepared for print. Especially, in my second posting, I would take back "is being duped" and replace it with "would be disappointed", which would make the sentence correctly express my belief. I am very sorry that I did not and still do not, have the time to fashion a thorough, orderly, and dispassionate critique. But it was a great mistake to let myself substitute strong language, because it diverts attention from the validity of the critical points that I made. Not to prolong the flame, I will communicate directly to the authors the rebuttals I have to points of their rejoinder. (I cannot reference this rejoinder, from toby@cs.man.ac.uk with subject line "A Practical Introduction to PHIGS and PHIGS PLUS", because it has not yet appeared on the system where I read comp.graphics. It was fowarded to me by a reader of another system.) It seems to me that the fundamental issue here is that my minimum standard for well crafted explanation in expository technical writing is somewhat more stringent than what satisfies many folk in this computer graphics community. If I dare risk one more emotive, I find this state of affairs discouraging. Ron Levine