Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!dali.cs.montana.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!think.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!news.funet.fi!cc.tut.fi!jk87377
From: jk87377@cc.tut.fi (Juhana Kouhia)
Newsgroups: comp.graphics
Subject: Re: Scene Description Standard
Message-ID: <1991May2.134020.4952@cc.tut.fi>
Date: 2 May 91 13:40:20 GMT
References: <MATT.91Apr30142917@mandala.think.com> <248@rins.ryukoku.ac.jp> <1991May1.135548.27865@mks.com>
Organization: Tampere University of Technology
Lines: 9


In article <1991May1.135548.27865@mks.com> david@mks.com (David Rowley) writes:
>Many people have suggested Renderman as being ``the answer''.

How about Thalmann & Magnanet-Thalmann animation language?
I have not read much about it, so I'm wondering if anyone could make a
summary about it. What it can do? What is the difference between T&M-T
language and RenderMan? Etc.

Juhana Kouhia