Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c++:13200 comp.lang.c:38940
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!torsqnt!lethe!tvcent!comspec!scocan!john
From: john@sco.COM (John R. MacMillan)
Subject: Re: 64 bit architectures and C/C++
Organization: SCO Canada, Inc.
Date: Wed, 01 May 1991 22:21:12 GMT
Message-ID: <1991May01.222112.13130@sco.COM>
References: <168@shasta.Stanford.EDU> <13229@goofy.Apple.COM>
Sender: news@sco.COM (News administration)

|>4. Would it be better not to have a 32-bit data type and to make int
|>be 64 bits?  If so, how would 32- and 64- bit programs interact?
|
|It is necessary to have 8, 16, and 32-bit data types, in order to be able
|to read data from files.

It's not necessary, but it does make it easier.

|I would suggest NOT specifying a size for the int
|data type; this is supposed to be the most efficient integral data type
|for a particular machine and compiler.
|
|[...]
|
|short	16 bits
|long	32 bits
|long long	64 bits
|int	UNSPECIFIED
|void *	UNSPECIFIED

Problem with this is that I don't think sizeof(long) is allowed to be
less than sizeof(int) which would constrain your ints to 32 bits.