Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!dali.cs.montana.edu!caen!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uunet!mcsun!ukc!strath-cs!ex-dcs!exua!CDHWilli
From: CDHWilli@exua.exeter.ac.uk (Charles Williams)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Software "Engineers"
Message-ID: <CDHWILLI.91May1203210@exua.exua.exeter.ac.uk>
Date: 1 May 91 19:32:10 GMT
References: <3844@ssc-bee.ssc-vax.UUCP> <3379@charon.cwi.nl>
	<1991Apr25.234953.20537@dbase.A-T.COM> <52183@nigel.ee.udel.edu>
Sender: CDHWilli@exua.exeter.ac.uk
Organization: Computer Unit. - University of Exeter. UK
Lines: 15
In-reply-to: new@ee.udel.edu's message of 29 Apr 91 22:48:56 GMT

In this country loads of people call themselves engineers: train-drivers,
machine-shop technicians, TV repairpersons et al. and there is no law that
stops anyone from *calling* themself a software engineer.  However the
mark of professional "Chartered" engineers is that they take responsibility
for the performance of their designs and that includes not only the
direct, but also in many cases any *consequential* loss or damage.

So that would mean that true "Chartered Software Engineer" could be recognised
by the fact that their software license starts along these lines: 

"Joe Bloggs C. Soft. Eng. warrants that this software functions correctly
 and accepts full and perpetual liability for loss or damage, direct or
 consequential which arises as a result of its use." 

========= My regular signature and I have separated for a trial period =======