Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!barmar
From: barmar@think.com (Barry Margolin)
Subject: Re: open-input-file [topics from hell, part 2]
Message-ID: <1991Apr30.045806.20824@Think.COM>
Sender: news@Think.COM
Organization: Thinking Machines Corporation, Cambridge MA, USA
References: <9104270655.aa29839@mc.lcs.mit.edu> <9104291603.AA12211@garlic.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 91 04:58:06 GMT

In article <9104291603.AA12211@garlic.Stanford.EDU> mkatz@garlic.stanford.EDU (Morris Katz) writes:
>If we ever get serious about adding a condition(error) system to scheme, I
>would suggest that we go back and take another look at the one in CLU.  (I
>believe that this system shares a lot of commonality with CL, but I am not a CL
>hacker and so have relatively little knowledge of the CL condition system.)

It sure does.  Combine the four features of the CLU condition system that
you described with the one feature you wished for an you have the CL
condition system.
--
Barry Margolin, Thinking Machines Corp.

barmar@think.com
{uunet,harvard}!think!barmar