Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!torsqnt!hybrid!chance!john
From: john@chance.UUCP (John R. MacMillan)
Subject: Re: Syntax for execmail
Message-ID: <1991Apr30.013449.1493@chance.UUCP>
Keywords: execmail SCO Unix mail syntax
Organization: Haphazard
References: <1991Apr24.214755.19788@osh3.OSHA.GOV> <2818BAD5.20CB@tct.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1991 01:34:49 GMT

|I suggest that all users of the SCO E-Mail system remove it and
|replace it with Smail 3.1, which can be found on uunet.uu.net as
|~/mail/smail3.1.20.Z. 

I suggest that users carefully consider their needs, and then choose
the most appropriate MTA.  If you want support, stick with MMDF, and
nothing (well maybe PP) beats it for authorization control, and it's
pretty gentle on heavily loaded systems, and ...

All MTAs have their advantages and disadvantages, blind allegiance is
probably not wise.  This is not intended as a flame, merely another
opinion. :-)