Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!DECUSERVE.DECUS.ORG!KILLEEN
From: KILLEEN@DECUSERVE.DECUS.ORG (Jeff Killeen Exec Committee)
Newsgroups: comp.org.decus
Subject: FYI - From DECUServe
Message-ID: <102C78716000313F@decuserve.decus.org>
Date: 2 May 91 18:12:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Lines: 24


               <<< EISNER::DUA3:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SOAPBOX.NOTE;1 >>>
                             -< DECUServe Soapbox >-
================================================================================
Note 340.146                The DECUS reorganization                  146 of 146
EISNER::TANNENBAUM "Saul Tannenbaum"                 16 lines   2-MAY-1991 12:30
                               -< Re. .-1, .-2 >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Me too.
    
    I like politics. I generally think that vigorous debate is a sign of
    health in an organization. Not this time.
    
    This whole process has been grim and ugly. It seems clear that a lot of
    what is being played out doesn't have much to do with the nuts and
    bolts of the reorganization. 
    
    Unlike the previous two noters, I don't as much blame the CON side.
    They didn't devise this process, the PRO side did. And I have read
    more thoughtful CON commentary than I have PRO commentary. But to say
    that is to measure the CON side against an uncommunicative,
    propaganda-oriented Board seemingly more interested in a rush to power
    than in reasoned debate.