Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!margo.ots.utexas.edu!jah
From: jah@margo.ots.utexas.edu (Jeff Hayward)
Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re: Amendments
Message-ID: <48131@ut-emx.uucp>
Date: 30 Apr 91 01:34:40 GMT
References: <4364.2816d635@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com> <1991Apr26.141044.7544@alphalpha.com> <1991Apr28.061119.18402@eecs.nwu.edu>
Sender: news@ut-emx.uucp
Organization: The University of Texas
Lines: 26

In article <1991Apr28.061119.18402@eecs.nwu.edu> ptownson@eecs.nwu.edu (Patrick A. Townson) writes:
> [...]
>No, it should *really* be noted that this option is only avoided like
>the plague by lawyers, ACLU-types, and other stupid liberals who want
>to save us from ourselves ...

No, it's opposed only by those who impose the requirement that
the delegates be of the same high quality as those in the last
convention, a condition that can be qualitatively judged not
likely to be met in today's (and possibly no future day's)
climate.  Tell me, Patrick, where you would find such statesmen
as Washington, Jefferson, Madison, and Franklin today.  There
seems to be no one among the politically powerful today who is
interested in liberty as a social goal.

The original convention met under circumstances and conditions
that were unique.  That we obtained the constitution we did, and
the body of statute and common law that has flowed from it, was
the result of a series of monumentally serendipitous events.

Many of us would not like to roll the dice and see what we would
get another time.
-- 
Jeff Hayward
The University of Texas System          +1 512 471 2444
Office of Telecommunication Services    jeff@nic.the.net