Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!stanford.edu!neon.Stanford.EDU!cmn14!lft
From: lft@cmn14.Stanford.EDU (Alfred Leung)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: Re: Problems with Mini-x (Yes already!)
Keywords: mini-x
Message-ID: <1991May2.023456.19555@neon.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 2 May 91 02:34:56 GMT
References: <7432@munnari.oz.au>
Sender: news@neon.Stanford.EDU (USENET News System)
Organization: CCRMA, Stanford University
Lines: 30

In article <7432@munnari.oz.au> bevan@ecr.mu.oz.au (Bevan Anderson) writes:
>G'day all.
>
>Yes I have allready got a problem with Mini-x.
>
>I compiled the new kernel last night, and have a problem.
>
>GRAPHICS in fs/table.c is not defined anywhere, so comiling
>it bombs out.
>So what and where should it be defined?
>Also, should there be a new valye for NR_PROCS ?
>Compiling kernel/table.c bombs out due to multiply defined case 
>statements or something like that.
>So should NR_PROCS be NR_PROCS + 1 ? (for the graphics)


I had the same problems.  What I did was:

in /usr/include/minix/com.h, I defined GRAPHICS as -8 

in /usr/include/minix/const.h, I defined NR_TASKS as 10 (was 9, 15 for
Amoebas?).

These are the two definitions that I know of to be changed for the added
graphic task.  Anyone got another fix?
--
-------------------------- Alfred Leung, grad student, Stanford U n i   v
gaia@portia.stanford.edu  | H H | H H H   H | H   |    .   H |   .
lft@ccrma.stanford.edu    | | | | | | | |   |   |  |    |            .  .
__________________________|----------------- --  - -   -   -  .