Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ccwf.cc.utexas.edu From: greg@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Greg Harp) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: NeXT Press Release Message-ID: <48297@ut-emx.uucp> Date: 2 May 91 19:25:34 GMT References: <47889@ut-emx.uucp> <47946@ut-emx.uucp> <6o6G#_oz1@cs.psu.edu> <48101@ut-emx.uucp> <48163@ut-emx.uucp> <+b5G-i&-1@cs.psu.edu> <48228@ut-emx.uucp> Sender: news@ut-emx.uucp Reply-To: greg@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Greg Harp) Organization: The University of Texas at Austin Lines: 19 In article melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger) writes: > >I question that I can't answer so maybe you can. Are the Amigas IB's >and Objects as refined as the ones on the NeXT? I have never seen code to work with the NeXT GUI so I can't say. I've heard from a few NeXT programmers that the IB is basically a requirement due to the time it would take to write the code by hand. However, that is someone else's opinion. That's certainly not the case with the Amiga. >-Mike Greg -- Greg Harp |"I was there to match my intellect on national TV, | against a plumber and an architect, both with a PhD." greg@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu| -- "I Lost on Jeopardy," Weird Al Yankovic