Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uunet!sdrc!cinnet!kilian From: kilian@cinnet.com (Kilian Jacob) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications Subject: Re: Kickstart 2.0 Message-ID: <1991Apr28.064946.27665@cinnet.com> Date: 28 Apr 91 06:49:46 GMT Article-I.D.: cinnet.1991Apr28.064946.27665 References: <1153@cbmger.UUCP> Organization: Cincinnati Network, Cinti. OH Lines: 18 From article <1153@cbmger.UUCP>, by peterk@cbmger.UUCP (Peter Kittel GERMANY): > Perhaps you also should see it from this view: In the past, the Amiga > has got the reputation of a not solid OS. Though this is really wrong, > the rumors are existing. Now engineering does all it is capable to > prove the contrary. They don't want to risk anything. I find this > understandable and simply right. > Why did Commodore release beta versions of 2.0? I think this is really a bad marketing strategy. If the developpers need more time, fine. But one shouldn't annouce a product before it is finished. What Commodore does really hurts its immage. -- /