Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!pacbell.com!tandem!zorch!amiga0!mykes From: mykes@amiga0.SF-Bay.ORG (Mike Schwartz) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc Subject: Re: Revised Amiga line Message-ID: Date: 30 Apr 91 21:33:46 GMT References: <4734@orbit.cts.com> Organization: Amiga makes it possible Lines: 23 In article <4734@orbit.cts.com> chucks@pnet51.orb.mn.org (Erik Funkenbusch) writes: >DXB132@psuvm.psu.edu writes: >>I hate it when someone suggests making another nonexpandible Amiga. What is >>the fascination with owning such a machine? Frankly, at least in the >>U.S. market, Commodore should drop the price of the 2000/2000HD so most people >>won't need to think about the 500. >> >>-- Dan Babcock > > >The reason is that expansion costs money. period, the end, final. no >expansion, means cheaper system. the current 2000 is ugly, and should be >redesigned. i know at least 3 people that went with clones over my insistant >pleas to buy amiga's over asthetics. they didn't like the mouse, and thought >the machine was ugly. > Just goes to show that great things come in ugly packages :) -- **************************************************** * I want games that look like Shadow of the Beast * * but play like Leisure Suit Larry. * ****************************************************