Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!wuarchive!udel!haven.umd.edu!socrates.umd.edu!mike From: mike@socrates.umd.edu (mike santangelo (UNIX/VMS Sys Staff)) Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp Subject: Re: Upgrade or Snakes ? Message-ID: <1991May03.205924.7068@socrates.umd.edu> Date: 3 May 91 20:59:24 GMT References: <1295@theseas.ntua.gr> Organization: University of Maryland, University College Lines: 94 zvr@ntua.gr (Alexios Zavras) writes: >Hi everyone! Howdy. > I would like to get some opinions on the decision we are facing: > We have a HP9000 850S, which has a number of terminals (say, >around 20), and is also on a net with a variety of otehr machines >(mostly suns). The idea is to upgrade the whole system, i.e. to >give better performance to a number of users. > One way to go is to upgrade the 850S to 865S (I think I have >the right numbers), which involves adding a processor, 16MB RAM >and two 26/64MB controllers. The problems is that the price HP ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ What do you mean by this? >quotes for this is, to say the least, *very* high (prices in >Greece are a lot different than the States, but we're talking >$136,000 here: I suppose the equivalent in US should be about ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Sounds about right. Specs on 865S: 53 (integer) MIPS 11.4 (double-precision) MFLOPS 768K Cache (256K I + 512K D) 8K TLB (2KB pages) The 865S was the fastest HP-PA 1.0 processor HP had until HP-PA 1.1 stuff came out (e.g. Snakes). Model 870/100 was same SPU but had capability to be upgraded in-cabinet to two of these processors, 870/200. Both 870 models had 256K additional I cache. >the half (?)). > As you can probably guess, we thought of better ways to invest >that kind of money: get some snakes (the 9000/700 machines). Terminals... You using HP asynch MUXs for this or TELNET terminal servers? You will need to use TELNET servers to do any serious asynch user-interaction on the snakes due to the user-license restriction (2 or 8 user), but if they come in over TELNET, no problem (thank goodness), they all cound as 1 user, so... >Possibilities include a 750 and a few 720, or just a bunch of 720s. > Now, keep in mind that the 850 already has 2GB disk, so it What kinda drives are these? How are they connected, HPIB or HPFL? Your likely to have a problem with either on the snakes, especially HPFL, although there is an EISA HPIB controller. Does anyone at HP want to comment on whether the CS/80 and SS/80 stuff is going to be/is supported driver-wise on HP-UX 8.X on the snakes? Can you, using this card, attach 793X disk drives and 7974/7978/7980 tape drives? >would be a sort of file server to the new machines. Would it >be able to handle the load, or would it crash from network requests ? The Model 850S has a combined (I & D) 128KB cache, the Snakes have at LEAST double this, TLB is 4K on 850S, ? on Snakes (can't find, but page size in HP-PA has doubled from 2K to 4K and the TLB has some interesting optimization that allow mapping multiple contiguous virtual pages). > So, another possibility is getting an I/O card for the 850S and >some 700s, to help it cope with the traffic from the faster snakes. I/O card for the 850S? Huh? What kind of I/O card? > What do you all think ? It seems to be a hot topic on the list right now just how well the Snakes do in a multiuser environment, apparently no one has had the ability to find out yet. What would be neat to see is a real benchmark along these lines, the TPC-A would do quite nicely. Anybody (esp. at HP) done any preliminary studies along these lines with some popular database like Informix or something? Would help gauge multiuser performance. >Any opinion would be much appreciated, >-- zvr -- > +---------------------------+ Alexios Zavras (-zvr-) > | H eytyxia den exei enoxes | zvr@ntua.gr > +-----------------------zvr-+ zvr@theseas.ntua.gr >Somebody said it couldn't be done / But he with a chuckle replied, >Maybe it couldn't, but he would be one / Who never said no till he tried. >So he buckled right in / With a brace and a grin > And if he was worried, he hid it, >He started to sing / As he tackled the thing > That couldn't be done > And he did it. -- Mike Santangelo (mike@socrates.umd.edu) UNIX / VMS Systems Manager