Xref: utzoo comp.sys.next:16791 news.groups:31486 comp.sys.amiga.advocacy:2392
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!pacbell.com!tandem!zorch!xanthian
From: xanthian@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Kent Paul Dolan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next,news.groups,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: split up comp.sys.next (PLEASE!!)
Message-ID: <1991Apr30.064449.18530@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG>
Date: 30 Apr 91 06:44:49 GMT
References: <1438@radius.com> <HXO3O8D@taronga.hackercorp.com>
Organization: SF-Bay Public-Access Unix
Lines: 14

> peter@taronga.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) writes:

> How about comp.sys.next.advocacy to get the risc-versus-cisc and
> next-versus-sparcstation flame wars out of comp.sys.amiga.advocacy?

No particular reason one end of that cross-posted flame war can't stay
in c.s.a.advocacy where it belongs, but I'll bet the NeXT folks would
_love_ to have a c.s.n.advocacy to get it out of their main reading
material, like we have.

[ You mean you actually _read_ c.s.a.advocacy, Peter?  ;-) ]

Kent, the man from xanth.
<xanthian@Zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <xanthian@well.sf.ca.us>