Xref: utzoo comp.sys.next:16842 news.groups:31527 comp.sys.amiga.advocacy:2417 Newsgroups: comp.sys.next,news.groups,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixb.cc.columbia.edu!sss10 From: sss10@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Grouchy Smurf) Subject: Re: split up comp.sys.next (PLEASE!!) Message-ID: <1991May1.041257.24081@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Sender: usenet@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (The Network News) Nntp-Posting-Host: cunixb.cc.columbia.edu Reply-To: sss10@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Grouchy Smurf) Organization: Columbia University References: <1438@radius.com> <1991Apr30.064449.18530@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> Date: Wed, 1 May 1991 04:12:57 GMT In article <1991Apr30.064449.18530@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> xanthian@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Kent Paul Dolan) writes: >> peter@taronga.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) writes: > >> How about comp.sys.next.advocacy to get the risc-versus-cisc and >> next-versus-sparcstation flame wars out of comp.sys.amiga.advocacy? > >No particular reason one end of that cross-posted flame war can't stay >in c.s.a.advocacy where it belongs, but I'll bet the NeXT folks would >_love_ to have a c.s.n.advocacy to get it out of their main reading >material, like we have. argh! no no no no no! the Next vs. any_computer_other_than_amiga doesnt belong here no matter how that thread got here. make a csn.advocacy group so those stupid flames/arguments/threads could go in another group. I dont mind the Next comparisions with the amiga but im NOT interested in RISC vs CISC that always come up when Next is mentioned. >[ You mean you actually _read_ c.s.a.advocacy, Peter? ;-) ] > >Kent, the man from xanth. > This is a test sig under construction