Xref: utzoo comp.windows.ms:12085 comp.sys.novell:1335 Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.sys.novell Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!fcom.cc.utah.edu!npd.novell.com!news From: jlamb@npd.Novell.COM (Jason "Nematode" Lamb) Subject: Re: Windows on diskless workstations Message-ID: <1991Apr29.232714.17351@npd.Novell.COM> Reply-To: jlamb@seneca.npd.Novell.COM (Jason "Nematode" Lamb) Organization: Novell Inc., Provo References: <8621@crash.cts.com> <1991Apr17.130557.14349@hubcap.clemson.edu> <1991Apr18.015949.26790@npd.Novell.COM> <1991Apr20.010210.26574@serval.net.wsu.edu> <1991Apr24.001555.25647@npd.Novell.COM> <1991Apr27.010456.6292@serval.net.wsu.edu> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 91 23:27:14 GMT In article <1991Apr27.010456.6292@serval.net.wsu.edu> ckinsman@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu (Chris Kinsman) writes: >> >>Yeah, yeah.. I corrected this the first time after someone pointed it out. >>You can disable paging in Windows 386 Enh mode. Cannot in Standard and Real. >>A minor error considering my point which was in most environments including >>diskless workstations (which started the thread) you would not want to >>disable paging for Windows in 386 Enhanced mode. (More on this in my second >>reply). >> >Bzzttt again! There is *NO* get this again *NO* paging in Standard or Real >modes. There are *TEMPORARY* files which are *NOT* the same as a swapfile >created in standard, real and in some instances 386EM. > >Chris > You know I sat here for about a millisecond with a response ready, about using the net to argue semantics, and about how Windows 3.0 DOES use paging in all three modes, and about answering the questioner's questions instead of the answerer's ego,... and then I reconsidered and figured I'd just let you play with yourself on this one.. Jason p.s. can they get you some decaf there at work dude?? -- ---- ---- Jason Lamb jlamb@Sed.Novell.COM ---- ----