Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!mcsun!unido!pemcom!ralfi
From: ralfi@pemcom.pem-stuttgart.de (Ralf U. Holighaus)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: SCO License security - another flame
Message-ID: <1165@pemcom.pem-stuttgart.de>
Date: 29 Apr 91 09:11:00 GMT
References: <1991Apr26.181047.21554@beaver.cs.washington.edu>
Organization: PEM GmbH, Stuttgart
Lines: 29

pauld@cs.washington.edu (Paul Barton-Davis) writes:


>"re"installed license copy #2 on the new box, figuring that
>duplication for a few hours for the purpose of copying out own files
>from one disk to another was legitimate. 

In fact, from the legal point of view, it is NOT legitimate.

>opticals - wanna new system: just format the disk, and dd the relevant
>system straight onto it. Quick, efficient, easy and generally
>foolproof.

You could do so with SCO, and then usr /etc/brand for the system speci-
fic files to 'brand' the new system to the new serial numbers.

>and as a side effect, make my life more difficult. If SCO paid the
>same attention to security that ISC did to a bug-free TCP/IP, we'd
>all be better off. [...]

On the other side: they obviously paid more attention to security than
ISC. Or did you read hundreds of news messages concerning 'SCO security
bug'? I remember well the 'ISC security bug'...

-- 
  PEM Programmentwicklungsgesellschaft    |         Ralf U. Holighaus
        fuer Microcomputer mbH            |         Technical Support
PO-Box 810165 D-7000 Stuttgart 80 Germany |     holighaus@PEM-Stuttgart.de
VOICE: x49-711-713045 FAX: x49-711-713047 |       ..!unido!pemcom!ralfi