Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sample.eng.ohio-state.edu!purdue!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!samsung!caen!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!mnopltd!neal
From: neal@mnopltd.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Since Most Everythings's right with SCO Can we make it smaller?
Message-ID: <214@mnopltd.UUCP>
Date: 28 Apr 91 22:40:30 GMT
Reply-To: gatech!stiatl!mnopltd!neal
Organization: MNOP Ltd., Atlanta, Ga.
Lines: 30


->
->In article <204@mnopltd.UUCP>, neal@mnopltd.UUCP writes:
->> The current (maybe hopefully past) ankle-biting parade over SCO is of no
->> interest to me.   SCO is as great as the world deserves.  Now, on to 
->> business.
->> 
->> I noticed that the Xenix 2.3.2 kernel is about 1000K.   The SCO Unix
->> kernel is about 2000K.   
->
->I thought that the advantage of Xenix was that it was supposed to be tiny.
->I also thought that I had a rather massive kernel on my ISC 2.2.  My
->kernel is 750K.  Are you sure you have your numbers right?
->
->Marc Rossner
->jahangir!marc@uunet.uu.net
->

I quoteth /usr/adm/messages:

L4L5L6MNOPmem: total = 3712k, reserved = 4k, kernel = 1148k, user = 2560k
                                                      ^^^^^

This includes: 2 Computone Boards

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neal Rhodes                       MNOP Ltd                     (404)- 972-5430
President                Lilburn (atlanta) GA 30247             Fax:  978-4741
                             emory!mnopltd!neal 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------