Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uunet!jwt!john From: john@jwt.UUCP (John Temples) Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386,fido.unix Subject: Re: wanted: UNIX or clone Message-ID: Date: 30 Apr 91 02:37:47 GMT Article-I.D.: jwt.W1-+BX+ References: <1991Apr28.155002.7791@unixland.uucp> <1991Apr28.212531.14727@agate.berkeley.edu> <1991Apr28.225644.10469@nstar.rn.com> Organization: Private System -- Orlando, FL Lines: 17 In article <1991Apr28.225644.10469@nstar.rn.com> larry@nstar.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes: >Sure - look at Norton - they are specifically for Interactive. Norton is for ISC, AT&T, and SCO UNIX. It says so right on the box. It would probably run fine on ESIX if you used the S51K file system rather than FFS, or it might even work with FFS. I'm not brave enough to find out. :) >Look at Word Perfect, they have a version for SCO Unix and Interactive >Unix - but not for ESIX. WP might run just fine under ESIX, but then >it might not. WordPerfect is listed in the ESIX software compatibility list. ESIX has even released console driver patches specifically to support WordPerfect. -- John W. Temples -- john@jwt.UUCP (uunet!jwt!john)