Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!tymix!cirrusl!ss168!dhesi From: dhesi%cirrusl@oliveb.ATC.olivetti.com (Rahul Dhesi) Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards Subject: Why not Multics? (was Re: BSD tty security, part 3: How to Fix It) Message-ID: <3096@cirrusl.UUCP> Date: 30 Apr 91 23:08:38 GMT References: <15896: Apr2714:35:3991@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <542@trux.UUCP> <1991Apr30.142053.2313@sctc.com> Sender: news@cirrusl.UUCP Reply-To: Rahul Dhesi Lines: 17 In <1991Apr30.142053.2313@sctc.com> stachour@sctc.com (Paul Stachour) writes: >Gee, with that kind of understandings, its no wonder that those of >us who have used Multics are kind of upset when we are forced to migrate >to systems where [non-Multics things happen]. So why are we all using UNIX and its derivatives? Why isn't Multics a commercial success even though it seems to have a unique place in history? More specifically, where can we buy Multics to run on our favorite hardware? Why can't we buy it? Inquiring minds want to know. -- Rahul Dhesi UUCP: oliveb!cirrusl!dhesi