Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sample.eng.ohio-state.edu!purdue!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!samsung!caen!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!mnopltd!neal
From: neal@mnopltd.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.sco
Subject: 386 SX chips, hardware caches
Message-ID: <213@mnopltd.UUCP>
Date: 28 Apr 91 22:34:52 GMT
Reply-To: gatech!stiatl!mnopltd!neal
Organization: MNOP Ltd., Atlanta, Ga.
Lines: 16


->For a 8 user system running SCO Xenix, how does a 386 SX compare to
->a 386 DX?  Does Xenix benefit from hardware caches - memory & hard disk?
->Typically, several users would be running VP/ix word processing and several
->Unify (rdb) under Xenix.

Surely you jest.   One Vpix user doing WP (heavy Desk top publishing) is 
enough to eat a 386.   Two sounds like slow death.   Add Unify and I think 
you are in big trouble. 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neal Rhodes                       MNOP Ltd                     (404)- 972-5430
President                Lilburn (atlanta) GA 30247             Fax:  978-4741
                             emory!mnopltd!neal 
                         gatech!emory!mnopltd!neal 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------