Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!decwrl!sgi!shinobu!fido.wpd.sgi.com!marktwain.rad.sgi.com!linton
From: linton@marktwain.rad.sgi.com (Mark Linton)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.interviews
Subject: Re:  InterViews and g++
Message-ID: <1991May2.162622.10392@fido.wpd.sgi.com>
Date: 2 May 91 16:26:22 GMT
References: <9105011942.AA17600@mrj.com>
Sender: news@fido.wpd.sgi.com (Usenet News Admin)
Reply-To: linton@marktwain.rad.sgi.com (Mark Linton)
Organization: sgi
Lines: 9

In article <9105011942.AA17600@mrj.com>, pwb@mrj.com (Peter W.  Brewer) writes:
|> 
|> Speaking of doc and 2.1 streams.. will the Stanford InterViews be providing
|> their own verison of 2.1 streams as they did 1.0-1.2 streams in InterViews
|> 2.6?

No.  It is more likely that we try to wean InterViews of streams.  The ANSI C++ library
committee is going to come up with a standard that is different from 2.1 streams,
so there won't be anything standard here for a while.