Xref: utzoo comp.os.msdos.misc:1893 comp.windows.ms:12197 comp.os.os2.misc:1179 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!emory!wa4mei!nanovx!msa3b!kevin From: kevin@msa3b.UUCP (Kevin P. Kleinfelter) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.windows.ms,comp.os.os2.misc Subject: Re: OS/2 2.0 is here! READ THIS, you'll be impressed Message-ID: <1626@msa3b.UUCP> Date: 1 May 91 19:31:40 GMT References: <4837@gumby.Altos.COM> <1991Apr26.211100.7830@thyme.jpl.nasa.gov> <8493@umd5.umd.edu> Followup-To: comp.os.msdos.misc Organization: Dun and Bradstreet Software, Inc., Atlanta, GA Lines: 49 bchin@umd5.umd.edu (Bill Chin) writes: >In article <1991Apr26.211100.7830@thyme.jpl.nasa.gov> kaleb@thyme.jpl.nasa.gov (Kaleb Keithley) writes: >>The absolute best way to guarantee acceptance of any version of OS/2 is >>to bring the price in line with competitive OS's. If OS/2, MSC, and SDK >>were $400, total, it'd sell like proverbial hotcakes. >Okay: >*r = retail price, *s = "street" price, or what one would expect to pay, >*e = edu price, and ~ means best guess. >Prices from vendors in latest PC Rag and local campus computer store. >All below probably "need" a 386 w/ 4mb RAM and 60mb HD's. > OS/2 Dev cost: > OS/2 SE 1.3 $150 *r ~$90 *e > MS-C 6.0 $300 *s $265 *e > OS/2 SDK ~$400 *s $350 *e > ----------- > total: $850 $705 edu > Windows Dev cost: > DOS 4.0 $75 *s $75 *s > Windows 3.0 $90 *s $80 *e > MS-C 6.0 $300 *s $265 *e > MS Windows SDK $325 *s $260 *e > ----------- > total: $790 $680 edu > > Alt Win Dev cost: > DOS 3.3 $60 *s > Windows 3.0 $90 *s > Borland C++ $325 *s > ----------- > total: $475 (edu pricing N/A) Alt Win Dev cost: DOS 3.3 $60 *s Windows 3.0 $80 *e << Borland C++ $95 *e << -------------------------------------- TOTAL (with ed prices) $235 edu In fact, DOS 3.x is often bundled with a clone, at no additional charge, giving an effective educational price for Win development at $175. -- Kevin Kleinfelter @ DBS, Inc (404) 239-2347 ...gatech!nanoVX!msa3b!kevin English Lesson: THEIR home is over THERE. THERE is one house. THEY'RE not home. "Its" & "their" are like 'his'. "They're" == "they are." "It's" == "it is." If you can do regular expressions, you can handle a natural language. Syntax!