Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!dont-send-mail-to-path-lines From: datta@vacs.uwp.EDU (David Datta) Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa Subject: Re: How To Make A CD (was Re: Practice Makes Perfect) Message-ID: <11618@uwm.edu> Date: 1 May 91 04:03:32 GMT References: <957778D360000139@sc.intel.com> <16480@scorn.sco.COM> <11571@uwm.edu> <16520@scorn.sco.COM> Sender: Love-Hounds-request@EDDIE.MIT.EDU Reply-To: datta@vacs.uwp.edu (David Datta) Organization: University of Wisconsin - Parkside Lines: 20 Approved: love-hounds@eddie.mit.edu In article <16520@scorn.sco.COM> "Jonathan S. Drukman" writes: >In article <11571@uwm.edu> datta@vacs.uwp.edu (David Datta) writes: >>If you want to avoid costs, record an RDAT digital cassette at 44.1 kHz. >Is this generally the accepted standard now? I thought the Sony >PCM-F1 format was the preferred one. The PCM-F1 format is still preferred by anyone who doesn't have the new 1-shot disc recorders. The new machine pretty much automatically takes an RDAT and builds the TOC on the fly then makes the single disc. This disc can be used to make the actual master for mass duplication. These machines are relatively new, I think they didn't start coming out until the end of last year and the prices have only gotten low enough for smaller studios to start buying them. -- -Dave datta@vacs.uwp.edu. The dune lizard lifts it's feet so they don't burn. This is it's life. Running in place and eating insects. What is the point? Why bother? Why not move someplace cooler?