Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!dont-send-mail-to-path-lines
From: L-H@cup.portal.COM
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Re: Homeground #41
Message-ID: <9105021253.1.23668@cup.portal.com>
Date: 2 May 91 19:53:29 GMT
Sender: Love-Hounds-request@EDDIE.MIT.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 14
Approved: love-hounds@eddie.mit.edu

Neal sez: 

>I've been saying that it is definitely a bootleg for almost a year.

>Why do they talk about a bootleg album and then turn around and issue
>a stern warning about the illegality of a bootleg video?

Maybe (hopefully) because it is possible to create an endless quantity 
of copies of video these days (with all the VCRs in existence), whereas
almost all bootleg titles aren't very easily obtainable after awhile. 

Remember: "The only good record is a Flat Record." (tm) Flat Records 

Larry (l-h@cup.portal.com)