Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!sun!amdcad!amdcad!military From: vvirrankoski@cc.helsinki.fi Newsgroups: sci.military Subject: Re: Definition of a mil Message-ID: <1991Apr30.044817.5067@amd.com> Date: 29 Apr 91 15:33:48 GMT References: <1991Apr22.072111.25750@amd.com> <1991Apr24.054558.18824@amd.com> <1991Apr29.050918.4011@amd.com> Sender: military@amd.com Organization: University of Helsinki Lines: 24 Approved: military@amd.com From: vvirrankoski@cc.helsinki.fi chidsey@smoke.brl.mil (Irving Chidsey) writes: > emery@aries.mitre.org (David Emery) writes: > > NEVER! A mil is NOT the angle subtended by 1 meter at 1000 meters. > It is, by definition, 1/6400th of a circle; that makes it very close to the > angle subtended by 1 meter at 1000 meters. The army does not yet have > sufficient statutary authority to change the value of pi. In fact, both of You are right. As definition, mil is the angle subtended by 1 meter at 1000 meters. That would mean that in the circle there would be about 6283 mils (and 1 mil is about 3.6'). But in practical reasons it has been defined that circle is more round number, that differs in different countries and history. The most usual is circle = 6400 mils but in the Finnish Armed Forces and in the cross-country track finding they use circle = 6000 mils and in the Swedish Army circle is 6300 mils. I'm not sure about the last fact, becouse my information is quite old.