Path: utzoo!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!cs.umu.se!dvljrt
From: dvljrt@cs.umu.se (Joakim Rosqvist)
Newsgroups: alt.sources.amiga
Subject: Re: Short Hello World
Message-ID: <1991May4.134458.7625@cs.umu.se>
Date: 4 May 91 13:44:58 GMT
References: <1991May2.102554.8679@cs.umu.se> <1200@cbmger.UUCP> <21231@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Sender: news@cs.umu.se (News Administrator)
Organization: Dep. of Info.Proc, Umea Univ., Sweden
Lines: 25

In article <21231@cbmvax.commodore.com> bj@cbmvax.commodore.com (Brian Jackson) writes:
>In article <1200@cbmger.UUCP> peterk@cbmger.UUCP (Peter Kittel GERMANY) writes:
>>In article <1991May2.102554.8679@cs.umu.se> dvljrt@cs.umu.se (Joakim Rosqvist) writes:
>>>>with SAS/C v5.0a (with 2.0 includes) to get an executable that is
>>>>//
>>>>// compiles and links into a 124 byte executable (62 byte codesize)
>>>
>>>Ok, assembler strikes back with this: (56 codesize, 92 executable)
>>>
>>>OpenLib=-408
>>>Output=-60
>>>Write=-48
>>
>>Shame on you, you cheated! You do an OpenLib without a CloseLib!
>>Perhaps this explains the difference.
>
>Not to mention absolutely no error checking. Hard to consider it
>a "fully compliant" answer to the problem. The question should be
>"how small can you make a -correct- 'hello world' ?"
>

What should I error-check? Perhaps somebody has removed dolib from ROM...
And since the C-code was 62 bytes codesize, it couldn't have included any
error checking either. Replies to amiga.programmer, please
/$DR.HEX$