Path: utzoo!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!cs.umu.se!dvljrt
From: dvljrt@cs.umu.se (Joakim Rosqvist)
Newsgroups: alt.sources.amiga
Subject: Re: Short Hello World
Message-ID: <1991May4.134045.7550@cs.umu.se>
Date: 4 May 91 13:40:45 GMT
References: <1991Apr30.213936.22878@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <1991May2.102554.8679@cs.umu.se> <1200@cbmger.UUCP>
Sender: news@cs.umu.se (News Administrator)
Organization: Dep. of Info.Proc, Umea Univ., Sweden
Lines: 21

In article <1200@cbmger.UUCP> peterk@cbmger.UUCP (Peter Kittel GERMANY) writes:
>In article <1991May2.102554.8679@cs.umu.se> dvljrt@cs.umu.se (Joakim Rosqvist) writes:
>>>with SAS/C v5.0a (with 2.0 includes) to get an executable that is
>>>//
>>>// compiles and links into a 124 byte executable (62 byte codesize)
>>
>>Ok, assembler strikes back with this: (56 codesize, 92 executable)
>>
>>OpenLib=-408
>>Output=-60
>>Write=-48
>
>Shame on you, you cheated! You do an OpenLib without a CloseLib!
>Perhaps this explains the difference.
>
I did not! It's ok to close a disk-library, but DosLib is in ROM, and
Closing it is the same as adding NOP's to the code. Anyway, with a
closelib it will be 60/96 bytes. Still shorter!
If you don't agree with me, reply in Amiga.programmer...

/$DR.HEX$