Xref: utzoo comp.benchmarks:624 comp.lang.postscript:8546
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!bfmny0!tneff
From: tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff)
Newsgroups: comp.benchmarks,comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Re: LaserDoctor PostScript results
Message-ID: <80426795@bfmny0.BFM.COM>
Date: 4 May 91 10:40:28 GMT
References: <1991May4.022016.7860@riacs.edu>
Reply-To: tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff)
Followup-To: comp.benchmarks
Lines: 20

In article <1991May4.022016.7860@riacs.edu> woo@pioneer.arc.nasa.gov (Alex Woo RAA) writes:
>PRINTER                 VERSION TIME    SUBMITTER
 ...
>TI Microlaser           52.1     55.45  sysnmc@chron.com

I don't know which MicroLaser that was (PS17 or PS35), but my PS35 with
2.5MB of memory gave


TI Microlaser PS35      52.1     38.63  tneff@bfmny0.bfm.com
                                 ^^^^^

-------------

which is a heck of a lot faster than 55.45.

One bit of potentially useful advice to testers is to remove any fancy
FILTERS that you might have uploaded to the printer to rebind operators
in some customized way, e.g., background logos.  These can make ordinary
printing take longer.