Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!unlinfo.unl.edu!hoss!ho From: ho@hoss.unl.edu (Tiny Bubbles...) Subject: Re: HST and v.32 (was: gobbly goop on v.32) Message-ID: <1991May9.014106.20816@unlinfo.unl.edu> Keywords: HST, is, goop Sender: news@unlinfo.unl.edu Nntp-Posting-Host: hoss.unl.edu Organization: References: <422@wybbs.mi.org> <1991May1.160650.7799@unlinfo.unl.edu> <3267@unocss.unomaha.edu> Date: Thu, 9 May 1991 01:41:06 GMT Lines: 21 fg041@unocss.unomaha.edu (fg041) writes: >I have noticed this frequently when calling Intel 9600ex modems from the >USR Courier HST. I'm not sure which modem is at fault (both ??) but I will >often get half a screenful of garbage before the session dies. That's because HST protocol is different from v.32; you don't mention using a Dual Standard, but only an HST, which suggests that you're making an HST or possibly plain ol' 2400-baud connection. Neither HST nor the Bell modulation scheme used for 2400 baud has a "connection termination" handshake, while v.32 does. (I could be wrong; HST<->HST connections *might* have such a handshake. I'm not fortunate enough to own a fast modem.) A plain ol' Courier HST cannot speak v.32, so you're bound to get noise at the end of a connection that is terminated by the other side. V.32 modems on v.32 connections should not exhibit this behavior. -- ... Michael Ho, University of Nebraska Internet: | Harry was too homely for Sally. (I have proof.) Disclaimer: Views expressed within are purely personal and should not be applied to any university agency.