Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!jarthur!nntp-server.caltech.edu!mustang!data.nas.nasa.gov!wk209!yamo From: yamo@nas.nasa.gov (Michael Yamasaki) Newsgroups: comp.graphics Subject: Re: Rendering performance Message-ID: <1991May8.014911.22604@nas.nasa.gov> Date: 8 May 91 01:49:11 GMT References: <1991Apr29.162712.1905@canon.co.uk> <1991May3.190648.13574@ucunix.san.uc.edu> <1991May3.224900.12807@dsd.es.com> <1991May6.114747.12681@canon.co.uk> <1991May6.234927.17724@dsd.es.com> <1991May7.090203.18257@canon.co.uk> <1991May7.094641.18738@ Sender: news@nas.nasa.gov Organization: NAS Program, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA Lines: 31 In article yamo@nas.nasa.gov (Michael Yamasaki) writes: > >The grid surface is a 64 x 64 array of verticies in 3D. >GL calls to qstrip. Count each "quad" as 2 triangles. >Gouraud shaded, not lit. Z-buffered. Timed for 100 timesteps. >Triangle size varies from a few pixels to thousands of pixels. > ># of grid surfaces tris total tris/second frames/second tris/frame > > 1 793,800 157,188 19.8 7938 > 2 1,586,700 188,444 11.9 15876 > 3 1,984,500 156,630 7.9 23814 > 3 2,381,400 141,497 5.9 31752 > Wow. How did I do that? This should read: # of grid surfaces tris total tris/second frames/second tris/frame 1 793,800 157,188 19.8 7938 2 1,587,600 188,551 11.9 15876 3 2,381,400 187,956 7.9 23814 4 3,175,200 188,663 5.9 31752 Just goes to show you can't believe everything you read... -Yamo- yamo@wk209.nas.nasa.gov yamo@amelia.nas.nasa.gov {ncar, decwrl, hplabs, uunet}!ames!amelia!yamo