Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!dali.cs.montana.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!udel!rochester!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!ub!dsinc!unix.cis.pitt.edu!pitt!willett!ForthNet
From: ForthNet@willett.pgh.pa.us (ForthNet articles from GEnie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: eForth
Message-ID: <2729.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 8 May 91 02:52:05 GMT
Organization: (n.) to be organized.  But that's not important right now.
Lines: 23

Category 1,  Topic 36
Message 15        Tue May 07, 1991
D.RUFFER [Dennis]            at 22:09 EDT
 
Re: R.CAVANAUGH [BobC]

 > standard user interface in the host?

That is a great idea Bob!  However, of the two eforths I have looked at
recently, they both had completely different compiler environments.  At least
for the "regeneration" stage, one uses MASM and the other uses a meta
compiler.  On the other hand, within eforth itself, I belive it is somewhat
compatable.  I haven't found time yet to actually test out the theory, but
that is the side Ting et. al. are striving for.  Compatability within Forth
should be achevable.  How you get into Forth is going to be a little bit
tougher to agree on.

   {B-{)>   DaR
-----
This message came from GEnie via willett.  You *cannot* reply to the author
using e-mail.  Please post a follow-up article, or use any instructions
the author may have included (USMail addresses, telephone #, etc.).
Report problems to: dwp@willett.pgh.pa.us _or_ uunet!willett!dwp