Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!MOZART.INFORMATIK.RWTH-AACHEN.DE!ricki From: ricki@MOZART.INFORMATIK.RWTH-AACHEN.DE (Richard Breuer) Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2 Subject: Re: TaylorModula-2 Message-ID: <9105081110.AA03468@rwthi3.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> Date: 8 May 91 11:10:32 GMT References: Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: Modula2 List Organization: The Internet Lines: 34 In comp.lang.modula2 you write: > Does anybody has work in the Taylor Modula-2 compiler? What you can say me >about it? >(I'm planing to buy it) >Thanks! >============================================================================ >INSTITUTO TECNOLOGICO Y DE ESTUDIOS SUPERIORES DE MONTERREY, CAMPUS SAN LUIS > MEXICO \//// >ROBERTO DOMINGUEZ GUTIERREZ, AL-ISC O O LONG LIVE MODULA-2!!!! >BITNET AL281785@VMTECSLP _ At the institute of computer science here in Aachen I've been using Taylor- Modula-2 (version 3.0 or so). I must say that the shareware Modula-2 compiler FittedModula-2 is a better one! Here are some reasons for my (own!) opinion: * TaylorModula-2 uses built-in keywords (like LVAR, LADR, ...) to distinguish the small from the large memory model on a PC. This causes great problems when porting programs to e.g. unix machines. FittedModula-2 uses environment variables/compiler switches for this. * FittedModula-2 is shareware. So you can test it before actually paying for it. I don't know exactly where FittedModula-2 can be found. If you are interested, I will look it up for you. So long, Ricki.