Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!boulder!gore!jacob
From: jacob@gore.com (Jacob Gore)
Newsgroups: comp.object
Subject: Re: Re: Run-time Type Errors in Smalltalk (was Re: blip (was...))
Message-ID: <1130014@gore.com>
Date: 5 May 91 15:01:52 GMT
References: <2367@m1.cs.man.ac.uk>
Reply-To: jacob@gore.com (Jacob Gore)
Organization: Gore Enterprises
Lines: 12

/ comp.object / cpp@calmasd.Prime.COM (Chuck Peterson) / May  2, 1991 /
> Has a cost of additional error and maintenance of dynamically vs.
> statically typed programming really been proven?

Proven shmoven.

I've spent many hours seeking a bug that a compiler for a strongly typed
language would have caught.  Proof enough for me.

Jacob
--
Jacob Gore		Jacob@Gore.Com			boulder!gore!jacob