Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uupsi!cmcl2!lanl!beta.lanl.gov.!mikeg From: mikeg@c3.c3.lanl.gov (M. P. Gerlek) Newsgroups: comp.org.acm Subject: Re: New format of CACM Message-ID: Date: 4 May 91 16:10:55 GMT References: <1991May3.125722.10073@cc.newcastle.edu.au> <5862@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> <1991May3.230122.13004@dsd.es.com> Sender: news@lanl.gov Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico Lines: 31 In-reply-to: rthomson@mesa.dsd.es.com's message of 3 May 91 23:01:22 GMT In article <1991May3.230122.13004@dsd.es.com> rthomson@mesa.dsd.es.com (Rich Thomson) writes: > > In article <5862@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> > jones@pyrite.cs.uiowa.edu (Douglas W. Jones) writes: > > > >All of this goes to say, ACM headquarters is responsive to complaints! > > So what's the phone number of ACM headquarters? From Thursday morning until now (Saturday morning), there's been 18 posts against the new CACM look, and 1 in favor. Not good. Should we do a straw poll, and forward the results to ACM HQ? -[mpg] mikeg@lanl.gov "...nineteen tequilas later, we had a deal: Havana goes back to the Mob, and Fidel and I would open a Kentucky Fried Chicken." PS- And I make the 19th post against the new format. So there. -- -[mpg] mikeg@lanl.gov "...nineteen tequilas later, we had a deal: Havana goes back to the Mob, and Fidel and I would open a Kentucky Fried Chicken."