Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!widener!netnews.upenn.edu!king.mcs.drexel.edu!txhou
From: txhou@mcs.drexel.edu (Xinjun Hou)
Newsgroups: comp.org.acm
Subject: Re: New format of CACM
Message-ID: <1991May6.221403.9439@mcs.drexel.edu>
Date: 6 May 91 22:14:03 GMT
References: <5862@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> <1991May3.230122.13004@dsd.es.com> <MIKEG.91May4101055@c3.c3.lanl.gov> <3045@cod.NOSC.MIL>
Sender: txhou@king.mcs.drexel.edu(Xinjun Hou)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Drexel University, Dept. of Math. and Comp. Sci.
Lines: 10

In article <3045@cod.NOSC.MIL> sampson@cod.NOSC.MIL (Charles H. Sampson) writes:
>
>     Count me as one of those against the new format.  I agree with every
>negative thing that's been said about it so far.
>
>                                Charlie

Me three

Xj