Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!uflorida!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!abvax!iccgcc!herrickd From: herrickd@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk Subject: Re: Amendments Message-ID: <4491.28255447@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com> Date: 6 May 91 18:04:06 GMT References: <4364.2816d635@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com> <1991Apr26.141044.7544@alphalpha.com> <1991Apr28.061119.18402@eecs.nwu.edu> <1991May2.202641.3154@mailer.cc.fsu.edu> Lines: 16 In article <1991May2.202641.3154@mailer.cc.fsu.edu>, otto@fsu1.cc.fsu.edu (John Otto) writes: > In article <1991Apr28.061119.18402@eecs.nwu.edu>, ptownson@eecs.nwu.edu (Patrick A. Townson) writes... >> >>I wish you would recall that it is supposed to be 'we the people' who >>do the governing, make the laws and decide how things are done ... why >>aren't we allowed to do it any longer? > > There's one place left. In the jury box, you can acquit no matter what > the judge may desire...John G. Otto jgo@fsu.bitnet jgo@rai.cc.fsu.edu Even better, if you can get appointed to a grand jury, you can subpoena some of those civil servants and make them explain their malfeasance under oath. dan herrick herrickd@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com