Xref: utzoo comp.os.misc:1814 comp.os.msdos.misc:1969 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!dali.cs.montana.edu!caen!uwm.edu!lll-winken!aunro!alberta!mts.ucs.UAlberta.CA!Al_Dunbar From: userAKDU@mts.ucs.UAlberta.CA (Al Dunbar) Newsgroups: comp.os.misc,comp.os.msdos.misc Subject: Re: Multi-User DOS Users - Where are You? Message-ID: Date: 8 May 91 03:52:48 GMT References: <1991May6.213439.1282@cedar.pfc.forestry.ca> Organization: MTS Univ of Alberta Lines: 26 In article <1991May6.213439.1282@cedar.pfc.forestry.ca>, jpanneko@cedar.pfc.forestry.ca (Jack Pannekoek) writes: >Comment: > >I am a newcomer to news and have been reading many of the newsgroups <<< multiple deletions >>> > >Question: > >There seems to be very little mention in any of the newsgroups that I >have been reading (comp.databases, comp.os.misc, comp.os.msdos."*", >comp.sys.ibm."*" and a few others) of multi-user DOS technology. Am >I really on the lunatic fringe, am I missing a newsgroup or are there >other closet multi-user/multi-tasking DOS people out there?? For >environemnts where UNIX system support is hard to come by and all >those DOS programs are so friendly and familiar, is not a multi-user >DOS environment a feasable alternative or am I missing something with >all the money and time I have saved myself and others?? One reason could be that this (at least as I see it) is comp.os.msdos. -------------------+------------------------------------------- Al Dunbar | Edmonton, Alberta | Disclaimer: "I disclaim disclaimers" CANADA | -------------------+-------------------------------------------