Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!o.gp.cs.cmu.edu!ralf From: ralf+@cs.cmu.edu (Ralf Brown) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview Subject: Re: SVGA versus Desqview Keywords: svga desqview spam Message-ID: <1991May5.155854.22506@cs.cmu.edu> Date: 5 May 91 15:58:54 GMT References: <1991May5.061248.19367@amd.com> Sender: netnews@cs.cmu.edu (USENET News Group Software) Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon Lines: 15 In article <1991May5.061248.19367@amd.com> phil@brahms.amd.com (Phil Ngai) writes: }QD's position is that SVGA support in DV is too much work. All they need to do is support VESA, which will cover over 90% of the SVGA boards in existence (ATI, Video7, STB, Tatung, Tseng, Orchid, Paradise, etc.). Those boards which don't already have VESA support in ROM only need a 2-3K TSR to add the support after the fact. -- {backbone}!cs.cmu.edu!ralf ARPA: RALF@CS.CMU.EDU FIDO: Ralf Brown 1:129/3.1 BITnet: RALF%CS.CMU.EDU@CARNEGIE AT&Tnet: (412)268-3053 (school) FAX: ask DISCLAIMER? Did | It isn't what we don't know that gives us trouble, it's I claim something?| what we know that ain't so. --Will Rogers