Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!fernwood!uupsi!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.std.internat
Subject: Re: Unicode vs ISO DIS 10646 (was universality of Latin-1)
Message-ID: <H_3BJ-D@xds13.ferranti.com>
Date: 6 May 91 18:00:45 GMT
References: <10003@plains.NoDak.edu> <ENAG.91May3200814@maud.ifi.uio.no>
Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 12

In article <ENAG.91May3200814@maud.ifi.uio.no> enag@ifi.uio.no (Erik Naggum) writes:
> a commercial at-sign with acute accent and cedilla below doesn't make
> much sense.  What should a Unicode display device do with that
> sequence of characters?

                        ,
It better display it as @ (more or less), because someone's gonna use it.
                        '
If you don't believe that, then consider the use of "!#%^&*|" in C.
-- 
Peter da Silva.  `-_-'  peter@ferranti.com
+1 713 274 5180.  'U`  "Have you hugged your wolf today?"