Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!sdd.hp.com!caen!uwm.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!gblock
From: gblock@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Gregory R Block)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: NeXT software size
Message-ID: <11798@uwm.edu>
Date: 5 May 91 18:06:31 GMT
References: <-?4Gl5w*1@cs.psu.edu>
Sender: news@uwm.edu
Reply-To: gblock@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
Lines: 15
Originator: gblock@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

From article <-?4Gl5w*1@cs.psu.edu>, by melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger):
> 
> 
> I meant that software size isn't important unless it affects
> performance.  I think I said this in one of my posts.  On the NeXT it
> isn't a big deal to have a program that is 2MB.
> 

So I imagine that a 500k program on a 68040 3000 will run as slow as a
2mb program on a NeXT?  I imagine NOT.

-- 
All opinions are my own, and not those of my employer.
Why?  He doesn't know I'm doing this.
								-Wubba