Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uupsi!sugar!peter
From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Subject: Re: NeXT software size
Message-ID: <1991May6.112522.8209@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Organization: Sugar Land Unix -- Houston, TX
References: <4d7Gypu=1@cs.psu.edu> <2202@aldebaran.cs.nps.navy.mil> <-?4Gl5w*1@cs.psu.edu>
Date: Mon, 6 May 1991 11:25:22 GMT

In article <-?4Gl5w*1@cs.psu.edu> melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger) writes:
> I meant that software size isn't important unless it affects performance.

Well, it appears that it does. When it takes a $5000 box to get acceptable
performance, and the previous 68030 box wasn't quite fast enough, I would say
that's significant.
-- 
Peter da Silva.   `-_-'
<peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>.