Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!wuarchive!psuvax1!news From: melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: An interesting idea... Message-ID: <7r8G&?-&1@cs.psu.edu> Date: 7 May 91 01:50:06 GMT References: <11879@uwm.edu> Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet) Organization: Penn State Computer Science Lines: 22 In-Reply-To: gblock@csd4.csd.uwm.edu's message of 7 May 91 00:34:26 GMT Nntp-Posting-Host: sunws5.sys.cs.psu.edu In article <11879@uwm.edu> gblock@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Gregory R Block) writes: More nightmarish delusions? You've forgotten again. Amiga is a computer, the Amiga competes with the MacIIci and the IBM model 55. The nExt, however, is a WORKSTATION, so keep the comparisons straight. What's the difference b/w a workstation and a PC? Could you define them for me. The boundaries have blurred. And since both of the above have more software on their little floppy than you have on your entire hard disk, maybe your comparisons are invalid.. You are joking, right? Not even the Amiga can claim to beat both of the above in market penetration, and you claim that yours is better than thiers, when it's not even better than the Amiga's???? Whatever. -Mike