Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!psuvax1!news
From: melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: An interesting idea...
Message-ID: <bfbGl+*&1@cs.psu.edu>
Date: 7 May 91 04:19:22 GMT
References: <rbaGn&?=1@cs.psu.edu> <1991May5.115329.24187@sugar.hackercorp.com>
	<_g5Gy0x*1@cs.psu.edu> <1991May6.110530.7978@sugar.hackercorp.com>
	<=0bGppm&1@cs.psu.edu> <12870@aggie.ucdavis.edu> <mo5G9+x&1@cs.psu.edu>
	<12876@aggie.ucdavis.edu>
Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Lines: 19
In-Reply-To: s110a010@deneb's message of 7 May 91 02:46:36 GMT
Nntp-Posting-Host: sunws5.sys.cs.psu.edu


In article <12876@aggie.ucdavis.edu> s110a010@deneb (Your worst nightmare) writes:

   >Yeah, Apple's MacIIci blows it away, and so does IBM's Model 55.  NeXT
   >is going to need to beef up their machine or else...
   >
   >-Mike

   I was refering to volume (units shipped = $ coming in.)

   "Big Boys" volume > nExt (Does this make it any more clear for you?)


I understood what you meant.  I wanted to get acrossed the point that
the NeXT produces a superior machine.  That is what's important right?
I wouldn't buy a computer from a company just because it sold more
than its competitor.

-Mike