Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!wuarchive!waikato.ac.nz!comp.vuw.ac.nz!actrix!templar!jbickers From: jbickers@templar.actrix.gen.nz (John Bickers) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: NeXT Press Release Message-ID: <2975.tnews@templar.actrix.gen.nz> Date: 2 May 91 08:26:29 GMT References: <47889@ut-emx.uucp> <47946@ut-emx.uucp><+b5G-i&-1@cs.psu.edu> <1540@ewu.UUCP> Organization: TAP, NZAmigaUG. Lines: 26 Quoted from by melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger): > And I've heard several Amiga people state the word processing isn't up > to par on the Amiga. Who knows, who cares. The important applications (writing code, writing scripts for ray tracers, etc) have things like CED and UEdit, along with the standards like MicroEMACS, "mg", all the "deep-VI-your files" clones, etc. Another important factor that folks overlook when discussing the core three user applications (word processing, spreadsheets, and databases, according to the old C= 64 days (haw)) is that the people with the $$ also want to share the data across machines. So already owning a particular machine within a corporate group has a big impact on their decisions about standards. Thus the PClone's success, and the success of platforms that aim to handle that market in a similar fashion (Mac, PC-Unix, etc). Macs, I think, have ridden the backs of yuppies to get into corporate positions. Like Unix and C have been pushed by CS students into mainstream areas. > -Mike -- *** John Bickers, TAP, NZAmigaUG. jbickers@templar.actrix.gen.nz *** *** "Endless variations, make it all seem new" - Devo. ***